Monday, October 30, 2006

FLORIDA PROPERTY TAX NEWS: COUNTY DOES A 180 AND OFFERS TAX BREAK ON AFFORDABLE RENTALS

Miami-Dade County government reversed its earlier firmly-held position and signaled its intention to establish property tax relief for apartment owners who dedicate certain of their units to affordable housing under a specified set of circumstances.

County government honchos are poised to introduce a program that will offer tax relief to a small segment of apartment building owners who offer affordable rentals.

The program is only a first step in addressing a growing and somewhat controversial increase in the tax burden shouldered by multifamily rental unit owners as a result of the real estate boom of the past five years, but it's the only remedy county leaders believe is allowed under current state law.

Many more property owners could be helped if the state Legislature changed tax laws, said County Manager George Burgess. Some have lobbied the Legislature to create special tax abatements to benefit apartment owners--and in turn renters--in the same way the homestead exemption and the Save Our Homes 3% tax cap benefit properties owned and occupied by permanent residents of Florida. Rental properties don't qualify for homestead exemption benefits.

Although no change in legislation authorizes different treatment of rental unit owners than before the last session of the Legislature, the County Manager and his appointed Property Appraiser nonetheless fashioned guidelines to provide relief in the very area in which the Legislature was petitioned in 2006--unsuccessfully. "Let's do whatever we can do locally to try to provide an opportunity for some of these owners of affordable workforce housing to get them a break," Burgess said.

The new program will be available to apartment buildings or complexes that were built with restrictive financing that gave them lower interest rates or some other benefit in exchange for keeping rents in a range defined as affordable by the federal government.

Typically these are larger apartment complexes. In order to get the favorable loan, the owner had to set aside some or all of the rental units in the building or complex for people earning low to medium wages.

If the borrowers violate these affordable-rent covenants, they run the risk of the loan being in default or payment being accelerated. In most cases, the owners signed rental agreements with lenders that run 20 or 30 years, said Frank Jacobs, Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser. They are not currently receiving county property tax breaks.

Under the current state law, Jacobs said, he can take those financing agreements and draft a land-use restriction for the owners to sign that mirrors the agreement. A county property tax break can be given once the land-use restriction is in place.

The county will publish applications for the tax relief program in newspapers and magazines that target business owners.

Jacobs said he doesn't know how many apartment owners will benefit from the new program, which is expected to begin in the next few weeks. The County's best estimate at the moment is that between 30 and 40 properties may qualify.

Buildings already subsidized with Section 8 vouchers or financed with Low Incoming Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) are not eligible for the program.

Burgess said Miami-Dade will continue to lobby the Legislature for lower property taxes for other multifamily apartment building owners. Many landlords have complained that double-digit tax increases and out-of-control insurance costs have forced them to hike rents or convert their units to condos.

About-face for the County?

This appears to be a fascinating about-face for County property tax officials, who have consistently taken the position in recent interviews with the press that this very form of tax relief is not AUTHORIZED by state law, but PROHIBITED by it.

For example, in The Miami Herald issue of September 13, 2005, some city leaders had gone so far as to complain that the Miami-Dade Property Appraiser was undermining efforts to improve the availability of reasonably priced housing. City leaders complained the county was raising taxes so high on rental housing owners they must either jack up rents or sell.

At that time, Jacobs said he lacked authority to assess affordable (although not necessarily government rent-restricted) apartment buildings any differently than any other property in the county, saying he is just following the law and cannot bend the rules for public officials who want him to go easy on middle-income earners. He said the law allows him to give a break to some low-income housing projects--for instance, the low-income tax credit housing backed by the federal government--but does not give him the discretion to pick and choose others. Jacobs said that until the Florida Legislature addressed the issue, his hands were tied.

But although state legislators balked last session at passing a measure aimed at providing tax relief for rental owners, some 6 weeks after The Miami Herald article quoting Jacobs as saying his hands were tied, somehow the County is now able to offer the very relief Jacobs had said on September 13 he was unable to offer.

Obviously, there is something missing from this picture. Give us a little while to look into this. We'll get back to you about this--hopefully in our next edition of Florida Property Tax News.

_______________________________________________________
Daniel A. Weiss is a former Attorney Special Master for the Miami-Dade County Value Adjustment Board with over 25 years property tax experience. Mr. Weiss represented the Miami-Dade County taxing authorities in litigation and appeals between 1981 and 1995 and has since represented taxpayers in property tax matters. In Florida Super Lawyers 2006, Weiss was named one of the top 6 local government lawyers in South Florida.

In Florida Trend magazine™'s Legal Elite's issue, July 2004, Mr. Weiss was selected by his peers as one of the top 30 government lawyers in the State of Florida.

For a free consultation regarding your property, contact us.

For More Information Click here

Friday, October 27, 2006

WESLEY SNIPES AT IRS; IRS SNIPES BACK!

Who among us has not fantasized how much better life would be without the big bite the IRS takes out of our earnings? Whose mind has not meandered back in time to think of how the robber barons of the late 19th and early 20th centuries amassed their family fortunes untrammeled by the dampening effect of income taxes?

Yet who but Wesley Snipes and a few other intrepid characters have had the gall to request $12 million in federal income tax refunds and to fail to file federal income tax returns for years on the purported basis that the IRS has no right to tax income earned in the U.S.?

Don't know what I'm talking about? Well, let's backtrack a few steps to fill you in on the latest great case of alleged tax fraud, before we proceed to discuss the relationship between the Wesley Snipes saga and your property taxes.

In short, two weeks ago, top box office draw Wesley Snipes was indicted on federal criminal charges for his alleged role in a bizarre tax avoidance scheme that allegedly included his seeking $12 million in fraudulent refunds and failing to file tax returns for 6 years.

An eight-count indictment filed in U.S. District Court in Ocala, Florida, and unsealed on October 17, charged Snipes, his former accountant, and a third defendant with attempting to defraud the government by claiming that his substantial income was immune from taxation.

The indictment alleges that Snipes conspired with one other person in addition to former certified public accountant Douglas Rosile in the scam. The third person indicted is the founder of a Florida corporation (now known as Guiding Light of God Ministries) which, it is alleged, "promoted and sold fraudulent tax schemes."

The essence of the claim on which the alleged fraud is based is that U.S. citizens can be taxed only on income earned from certain foreign-based activities and not on money made in the U.S. This claim is known as the "861 argument." The name derives from the section of the internal revenue code to which it refers. Unfortunately, the argument has been resoundingly rejected by the Internal Revenue Service. As part of the alleged scheme, Snipes filed amended tax returns seeking $12 million in refunds on taxes he paid in 1996 and 1997.

Snipes's participation in the bold effort at tax avoidance came to the fore in 2002, when the Department of Justice sought an injunction against Snipes's former CPA. As an exhibit to the motion for restraining order, DOJ attached a copy of Snipes's amended 1997 tax return, which his CPA had prepared. To review the amended return, click here

Snipes sought a $7.3 million refund of taxes previously paid on his $19.2 million in 1997 earnings. The amended return was premised on the assertion that the star's income was "not from a taxable source." The form contained a charmingly revised affirmation next to the form's signature line. The return was (unlike yours and mine)
filed "Under no penalties of perjury."

So what's all this have to do with property taxes, the subject matter of this blog, you ask? Well, the answer is that it invites us to take another look at Benjamin Franklin's coinage, "Nothing's inevitable save death and taxes." And it invites us to steer a middle course between the government's position on property taxes--which the layman frequently assumes is, "They'll take as much as they can get" and Wesley Snipes's approach, which evidently was, "They're not going to get anything from me."

We've said it before. Now we'll say it again. While liability for some amount of taxes may be inevitable, the amount of taxes you pay is not inevitable. It is subject to study and review and planning. On the federal income tax side, this is work to be done with your accountant. On the property tax side, this is work to be done with your property tax lawyer or other professional.

One cheerful development in our practice is that we find more and more taxpayers consulting us on property tax issues before they act rather than after. This means before demolition and reconstruction of a homestead residence, or prior to sale or purchase of commercial, industrial or residential property; any time valuable property tax benefits may be at stake.

So don't learn only from your own mistakes. Learn from Wesley Snipes's predicament, too. Work with your property tax professional to try to trim your taxes--but take a leaf from Benjamin Franklin, too, and don't expect to eliminate your taxes altogether!

The next entry of this blog will be an edition of Florida Property Tax News describing two property tax reductions we recently obtained on land valuations in Orange County, Florida, reducing one assessment from $96,000 to a nominal $1,000 and the second from $48,000 to $1,000. We didn't eliminate the taxes altogether, but we got pretty close!
__________________________________________________________________________________
Daniel A. Weiss is a former Attorney Special Master for the Miami-Dade County Value Adjustment Board with over 25 years property tax experience. Mr. Weiss represented the Miami-Dade County taxing authorities in litigation and appeals between 1981 and 1995 and has since represented taxpayers in property tax matters. In Florida Super Lawyers 2006, Weiss was named one of the top 6 local government lawyers in South Florida.

In Florida Trend magazine™'s Legal Elite's issue, July 2004, Mr. Weiss was selected by his peers as one of the top 30 government lawyers in the State of Florida.

For a free consultation regarding your property, contact us.

For More Information Click here

Friday, October 06, 2006

FLORIDA PROPERTY TAX NEWS

What time of year is it?

It's Florida property tax news time. From August through November, newspaper real estate editors, business columnists, and journalists looking for topics of popular interest turn to property taxes for these four months of the year.

Why? I'll tell you why. During these four months, all 67 county property appraisers in Florida send out all their notices of proposed taxes--for each of the millions of parcels of real estate and tangible personal property--to every property owner; 67 county value adjustment boards receive between 0 and 40,000 petitions for tax appeals each; the property appraisers rspond to taxpayer inquiries; real and tangible tax rolls are certified by the property appraiser to the tax collector for collection; the tax collector sends out a bill for every parcel, and begins the collection process, starting in November, the month during which payments received garner a 4% discount.

So, from time to time between now and November, we will be featuring topics in Florida property tax news which attract the attention of the taxpaying public, and of those journailsts who write for that public.

While you're waiting for the first installment from Florida property tax news to be broadcast from this blog, take a moment to peruse my comments and the keen analytical reportage of the real estate editor of The Miami Herald in the article to which we provide a link below, titled "Property Taxes Crimp Affordability of Homes."

click here


_______________________________________________________________________________
Daniel A. Weiss is a former Attorney Special Master for the Miami-Dade County Value Adjustment Board. Mr. Weiss now represents commercial, institutional charitable, commercial, high-end residential, agricultural and municipal taxpayers at VAB proceedings throughout the State of Florida. Mr. Weiss handles both valuation and legal claims.

Mr. Weiss has over 25 years property tax experience. Mr. Weiss represented the Miami-Dade County taxing authorities in litigation and appeals between 1981 and 1995 as a Miami-Dade Assistant County Attorney and has since represented taxpayers in property tax matters.

Mr. Weiss appears as one of Florida's Super Lawyers 2006 in the publication of the same name. He was named by his peers as one of the top 6 local government lawyers in South Florida.

In Florida Trend magazine™'s Legal Elite's issue, July 2004, Mr. Weiss was selected by his peers as one of the top 30 government lawyers in the State of Florida.

For a free consultation regarding your property, contact us.

For More Information Click here

FLORIDA PROPERTY TAX APPEALS: PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK!

Disclaimer: The following article does not constitute legal advice, but is for informational purposes only. Every property tax appeal must be evaluated on its own facts and legal principles. Such evaluation is best undertaken by consulting a professional.

Some of the most frustrating experiences I have had as a property tax professional are the times when I have:

• Wanted to “jump in” at a property tax appeal hearing and help a taxpayer presenting his own case.
• Squirmed in sympathy when a taxpayer answered a question asked at hearing by the taxing authorities intended to elicit an answer to prejudice a taxpayer’s claim.
• Overheard a property appraisal employee at the public service counter ask a taxpayer for a document ostensibly to help the taxpayer establish an exemption claim, when the true purpose was to substantiate denial of the claim.
• Seen a taxpayer appear at hearing without reading the fine print on the 3-page notice of hearing and inadvertently failing to comply with Florida’s recently-adopted 15-day advance evidence filing requirement.

But I’ve managed to restrain myself (except on one notable occasion, when I insinuated myself into a hearing to act as an “amicus curiae,” a friend of the court, to inform the legal Special Magistrate of the status of the law regarding eligibility of certain ICE or immigration statuses eligible for permanent residency under Florida homestead exemption law).

Bottom line is, what was initially intended as an informal opportunity for an aggrieved taxpayer to appear before 3 members of the county commission and 2 members of the county school board has turned into a highly-technical, rule-intensive and fact-intensive evidentiary hearing before an appointed professional appraiser Special Magistrate or attorney Special Magistrate. The property tax assessment appeal hearing is governed by a slew of procedural rules and statutory and regulatory principles governing both the process and the substantive aspects of property tax assessment and appraisal, as well as exemption and classification issues.

The conclusion I have come to after 25 years of property tax practice on both sides of the fence—representing first the taxing authorities and later private, institutional and even public (e.g., municipal) taxpayers, is that there are two categories of property tax appeals. Some property tax appeal claims can be handled by taxpayers and some should be handed over to professionals, as briefly explained below.

Taxpayers should represent themselves only if:

1. there exists a provable factual error upon which the property tax assessment is based, such as incorrect legal description, erroneous measurement of land or improvements; or
2. the stakes are so low that no professional tax representative is willing to take on the job.

The taxpayer himself or herself may feel comfortable making an appointment to see the local government official responsible for your property tax assessment and review with her or him the following possible property tax assessment errors:


1. Inaccurate property description or dimensions.

2. Clerical errors.

3. Mathematical errors.

Other issues that the taxpayer may want to personally address to the property appraiser but may want to hire a professional for before proceeding to hearing, include:

4. Failure to consider needed repairs.

5. Failure to consider value-reducers like difficult ingress and egress, easements, drainage problems, heavy traffic areas, nearby railroad tracks, expressways, industry or noxious uses.

6. Lower assessments on similar properties in the neighborhood. Although market value is generally the controlling standard, by law, taxation must be fair and equitable.

7. Failure to depreciate for negative factors (deferred maintenance, age and quality of materials, poor workmanship, spalling, cracks or deterioration, defective or outmoded materials or construction, physical, functional or economic obsolescence of land or improvements).

In general, it is well to consider hiring a professional to prepare and advance the following property tax appeal claims:

8. Income producing property overassessed.

9. Failure to recognize decreased value due to downward trend in the real estate market.

10. Unlawful assessments, such as double assessment of common areas both to individual owners and to homeowners association.

11. Exemptions or exceptions to full value taxation (including agricultural classification) not applied or not properly applied to the property.

General rules governing the decision whether to employ a professional for your property tax appeals:

A. Commercial properties, including vacant as well as developed property, should be reviewed annually with a professional as soon as the notice of proposed taxes is issued in August. Most property tax professionals work on a contingency basis. This gives you some assurance that you are not investing in a tax appeal that is frivolous, since your agent gets no fee unless a reduction is obtained.
B. Taxpayers with unusual professional training or background, such as real estate investors, brokers, agents, accountants or attorneys, may obtain equal or better results than a “hired gun,” especially considering their enhanced familiarity with the negatives of the property, increased “investment” in the property, and net gain from not paying a professional fee.

Summary: as is true of many government processes, property tax appeals in Florida may best be handled by professionals. This is particularly true since most property tax agents work on a contingency fee basis. This means that no fee is earned unless an assessment reduction is achieved. Certain claims may be handled just as well by taxpayers themselves, particularly claims based on provable factual errors made by the county property appraiser, such as errors in measurement of the size of land or building which can be demonstrated through sealed survey or sketch or architectural renderings. If in doubt, review your property tax assessment with a professional. As in other contingency-fee industries, initial consultation is frequently free of charge.
____________________________________________________
Daniel A. Weiss is a former Attorney Special Master for the Miami-Dade County Value Adjustment Board. Mr. Weiss now represents commercial, institutional charitable, commercial, high-end residential, agricultural and municipal taxpayers at VAB proceedings throughout the State of Florida. Mr. Weiss handles both valuation and legal claims.

Mr. Weiss has over 25 years property tax experience. Mr. Weiss represented the Miami-Dade County taxing authorities in litigation and appeals between 1981 and 1995 as a Miami-Dade Assistant County Attorney and has since represented taxpayers in property tax matters.

Mr. Weiss appears as one of Florida's Super Lawyers 2006 in the publication of the same name. He was named by his peers as one of the top 6 local government lawyers in South Florida.

In Florida Trend magazine™'s Legal Elite's issue, July 2004, Mr. Weiss was selected by his peers as one of the top 30 government lawyers in the State of Florida.

For a free consultation regarding your property, contact us.

For More Information Click here